Preliminary experience of ovarian tissue cryopreservation procedure: alternatives, perspectives and feasibility

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy induce premature ovarian failure in many patients treated for oncological or benign diseases. The present paper reviews the risk of developing premature ovarian failure according to the type of treatment and the different options to preserve fertility, focusing on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue. This technique constitutes a promising approach to preserve the fertility of young patients and offers the advantage of storing a large number of follicles that could be subsequently transplanted or cultured in vitro to obtain mature oocytes. Based on 34 requests, from which 19 were performed, the feasibility of the ovarian cryopreservation procedure is evaluated. The medical and ethical approaches of this protocol are also discussed. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue constitutes new hope for many patients, but must still be kept for selected cases, with a significant risk of premature ovarian failure after treatments such as bone marrow transplantation.

Quality of care for cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: Development of key interventions and outcome indicators using a two-round Delphi approach

Purpose: Clear recommendations on how to guide patients with cancer on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) are lacking as the use of HPN in this population remains a controversial issue. Therefore, the aims of this study were to rank treatment recommendations and main outcome indicators to ensure high-quality care and to indicate differences in care concerning benign versus malignant patients. Methods: Treatment recommendations, identified from published guidelines, were used as a starting point for a two-round Delphi approach. Comments and additional interventions proposed in the first round were reevaluated in the second round. Ordinal logistic regression with SPSS 2.0 was used to identify differences in care concerning benign versus malignant patients. Results: Twenty-seven experts from five European countries completed two Delphi rounds. After the second Delphi round, the top three most important outcome indicators were (1) quality of life (QoL), (2) incidence of hospital readmission and (3) incidence of catheter-related infections. Forty-two interventions were considered as important for quality of care (28/42 based on published guidelines; 14/42 newly suggested by Delphi panel). The topics 'Liver disease' and 'Metabolic bone disease' were considered less important for cancer patients, together with use of infusion pumps (p = 0.004) and monitoring of vitamins and trace elements (p = 0.000). Monitoring of QoL is considered more important for cancer patients (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Using a two-round Delphi approach, we developed a minimal set of 42 interventions that may be used to determine quality of care in HPN patients with malignancies. This set of interventions differs from a similar set developed for benign patients. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Androgens and breast cancer

info:eu-repo/semantics/published